header
 
 

Our Performance

 

 

Management of Safety

We take a proactive and preventative approach to the management of safety. We partner with designers, developers and scientists at the very earliest stage of projects to. In this way we identify and manage the hazards ensuring that the risks are minimised throughout the project and once the end product is delivered. For example, we have taken considerable care in the construction, occupation and management of our new buildings at Sandwich and Granta Park in Cambridge.

Similarly, the development and operation of our R&D and manufacturing process plants are undertaken with prevention of accidents as a priority. Our current key focus areas include driver safety, manual handling and other ergonomic injuries and ensuring a robust Safe System of Work programme.

We are proud to note that both the Research and Development and the Manufacturing operations at Sandwich have accreditation to the international Health and Safety Standard OHSAS18001. This is recognition of the high standard of the management of safety and is an excellent position on which to continue to further improve our safety performance.

 

Accidents and Near Misses

There is a wide variety of activities performed in our facilities with the potential for accidents or hazardous incidents. These activities range from office working, construction activities, handling hazardous substances and business and personal travel.

We define an accident as an occurrence that has resulted in an injury to a person, or in significant environmental impact. A Near Miss, however, is an occurrence that has the potential to result in an accident. We believe that all accidents and near misses are preventable. Studies have shown that for every accident (causing injury or damage), there are many more near miss incidents that on another day may have caused an injury. The reporting and investigation of near misses is therefore a valuable tool in identifying actions to reduce the likelihood of future accidents. For this reason we continue to raise staff awareness of near misses with the specific aim of getting a greater percentage of them reported.

We operate reporting and investigation procedures for all accidents and near misses. The level of investigation varies depending on the seriousness (or potential seriousness) of each event. However, our principle objective is to identify the underlying or root cause and take corrective action. This may include providing improved training, correcting the cause of equipment failures or improving our systems of management. In 2007 PGRD introduced an improved incident reporting and investigation tool similar to that used in PGM. The same tool is being rolled out to our Worldwide Pharmaceutical Operations (WPO) HQ in 2008.

 

Performance

During 2007 we saw a steady improvement in the Near Miss to Accident Ratio. This is thought to result from an elevated emphasis of the benefits of reporting near misses and accidents which do minimal harm and may therefore be considered by some as trivial and of little value to report. By reporting these incidents our colleagues enable us to correct deficiencies which may have been the cause of greater harm at some future date.

accident graph

We also track all accidents (irrespective of any lost time) as the number of accidents for each 100,000 hours worked. Our accident frequency rate has risen during 2007. Although, superficially this is not the desired trend , further analysis of this data reveals that the frequency rate increase in 2007 is driven by an increase in minor accidents being reported, that we believe has resulted from improved reporting mechanisms and awareness campaigns. However, we will be monitoring the ongoing trend carefully in line with our longer term goal to reduce the accident frequency rate.

frequency graph

 

Greater than three-day injuries

Any absence resulting in absence for more than three days is reportable to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Although the number of these types of accident is relative small in comparison to our employee population we of course aim to have no accidents where employees are affected in this way. During 2007 there were 9 accidents that resulted in greater than three days lost time.

3 day accidents

These accidents may also be expressed as a frequency rate to take account of the employee population. In 2007 our performance remains well below the average for the UK based on data published by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) relating to 2005 to 2007.

lost time graph

 


 

Home